<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tools and Methods for Quick Idea Validation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kitetail.com/2007/10/23/tools-and-methods-for-quick-idea-validation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kitetail.com/2007/10/23/tools-and-methods-for-quick-idea-validation/</link>
	<description>practical ideas on innovation and technology management</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: binnur</title>
		<link>http://blog.kitetail.com/2007/10/23/tools-and-methods-for-quick-idea-validation/#comment-7224</link>
		<dc:creator>binnur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kitetail.com/2007/10/23/tools-and-methods-for-quick-idea-validation/#comment-7224</guid>
		<description>Bob,

Thank you for the pointers to Drucker. For those looking for the Business Week article, &lt;a href="http://homepage.mac.com/bobembry/studio/biz/conceptual_resources/authors/peter_drucker/entre_innovation.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here is the direct link Bob indicated&lt;/a&gt;.  
As always, Drucker is quite insightful and very direct. Here is a telling quote from the article, which I enjoyed reading:
&lt;em&gt;"In this country we by and large still believe that entrepreneurship is having a great idea and that innovation is largely R&#38;D, which is technical. Of course we know that entrepreneurship is a discipline, a fairly rigorous one, and that innovation is an economic not a technical term, and entrepreneurship creates a new business. That's not news. In fact, it's what made Edison so successful more than a century ago. But American businesses with few exceptions—Merck, Intel, and Citibank come to mind—still seem to think that innovation is a "flash of genius," not a systematic, organized, rigorous discipline."&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>Thank you for the pointers to Drucker. For those looking for the Business Week article, <a href="http://homepage.mac.com/bobembry/studio/biz/conceptual_resources/authors/peter_drucker/entre_innovation.html" rel="nofollow">here is the direct link Bob indicated</a>.<br />
As always, Drucker is quite insightful and very direct. Here is a telling quote from the article, which I enjoyed reading:<br />
<em>&#8220;In this country we by and large still believe that entrepreneurship is having a great idea and that innovation is largely R&amp;D, which is technical. Of course we know that entrepreneurship is a discipline, a fairly rigorous one, and that innovation is an economic not a technical term, and entrepreneurship creates a new business. That&#8217;s not news. In fact, it&#8217;s what made Edison so successful more than a century ago. But American businesses with few exceptions—Merck, Intel, and Citibank come to mind—still seem to think that innovation is a &#8220;flash of genius,&#8221; not a systematic, organized, rigorous discipline.&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Embry</title>
		<link>http://blog.kitetail.com/2007/10/23/tools-and-methods-for-quick-idea-validation/#comment-7139</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Embry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kitetail.com/2007/10/23/tools-and-methods-for-quick-idea-validation/#comment-7139</guid>
		<description>See Peter Drucker's Innovation and Entrepreneurship for an exploration of Purposeful Innovation and the Seven Sources of Innovative Opportunity plus the contrast with the Bright Idea. The fundamental starting question might be: "What needs doing?"
Also there is a Drucker interview on Entrepreneurship and Innovation that appeared in Business Week several years ago.
Google: bobembry drucker innovation entrepreneurship</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Peter Drucker&#8217;s Innovation and Entrepreneurship for an exploration of Purposeful Innovation and the Seven Sources of Innovative Opportunity plus the contrast with the Bright Idea. The fundamental starting question might be: &#8220;What needs doing?&#8221;<br />
Also there is a Drucker interview on Entrepreneurship and Innovation that appeared in Business Week several years ago.<br />
Google: bobembry drucker innovation entrepreneurship</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
